13 dic 2009

The king

Why a king have to be a king because his father had been that?
I mean, why this office have to pass to king's sons, if they hadn't done nothing? Why all the power of the country have to be in the hands of a person only because the father of that person had been important in the past or the father had have a father who was importat etc.
Yes, maybe an ancestor of the family had been very important because he conquered a lot of countries, or he killed bad people... but his sons didn't do it, and the power of the conqueror will pass to his son because he is his son, and no more.
I think that if we change of presidents, a persons who improves our lives and changes them (well, this is what they should do...), why we can't change of king?
No, wait... why we have to got a king? What will happen if there aren't one? He is only a person considered "superior" to other one because he was instructed more than other one in the state control, and maybe the father will instruct his son... it's good, but a person who aren't in the king family, he won't be a king, and I think that it should change. If we have a democracy, I think that it should change and be a really democracy, a democracy where all can change if the people wants the change.
Maybe all of that I've sayed it's wrong, and a "normal" person can be a king, I only say what I think and believe.