Is correct to evaluate the madurity of someone?
In my opinion: Not. I think that all we have our own maturity, it's difficult to find someone who thinks that he isn't mature, because at these moments, the people thinks that if you aren't mature, you are like a child. According to Word Reference diccionary:
mature, matured
fully considered and perfected; "mature plans"
To say that someone isn't mature, is to say that he doesn't got his thoughts well desenvolupated or perfected. But what's to have a fully considered and perfected thoughts? To answer this question we need to have a point guide, a kind of thoughts that "all" of us have accepted them like "mature thoughts", or "a mature way of thinking". But according to his definition, we shouldn't need a guide point to compare two thoughts, what we should need, it's to think if that thought is adapted to the person who has created it, it's to "see" if that thought is adapted objectively to his way of thinking and feel...
"I won't talk to her because he hurted me saying that I get tired inmediatly when I'm running!"
This argument is mature. The boy who have said that have thought that if he does this the girl who have said it to him will react and maybe she could apologize to him, or to talk about it etc.
To summarize, I think that if an argument is made good if it have his premises and his conclusions. The content doesn't matter too much.
In my opinion: Not. I think that all we have our own maturity, it's difficult to find someone who thinks that he isn't mature, because at these moments, the people thinks that if you aren't mature, you are like a child. According to Word Reference diccionary:
mature, matured
fully considered and perfected; "mature plans"
To say that someone isn't mature, is to say that he doesn't got his thoughts well desenvolupated or perfected. But what's to have a fully considered and perfected thoughts? To answer this question we need to have a point guide, a kind of thoughts that "all" of us have accepted them like "mature thoughts", or "a mature way of thinking". But according to his definition, we shouldn't need a guide point to compare two thoughts, what we should need, it's to think if that thought is adapted to the person who has created it, it's to "see" if that thought is adapted objectively to his way of thinking and feel...
"I won't talk to her because he hurted me saying that I get tired inmediatly when I'm running!"This argument is mature. The boy who have said that have thought that if he does this the girl who have said it to him will react and maybe she could apologize to him, or to talk about it etc.
To summarize, I think that if an argument is made good if it have his premises and his conclusions. The content doesn't matter too much.
