Human rights are not respected. Perhaps it's time to do away with them.

Human rights are so important for Humanity because their meaning and intention to make the world a better place accepting an universal way of think based on equality and respect.

But some persons could not respect them because they could difficult or close some works.

Firstly, because in those countries, where there are slavery yet, rich people won't respect these rights because if they do it they'll lose a fortune. Humans are egoist, like all animals everywe wants to satisfy our wishes. We'll adapt them to the rules and laws to avoid punishments, but if that punishment it's just to be looked like a bad man or to see the pain of another person we could just ignore it.

Secondly, because our laws and rights can be looked like just ways of think, and everyone has a different mentality but society and especially our parents are who tells us what's wrong and what's right. If this point failures, the child could get his own etical mind and to don't care about that respected and globally accepted laws.

Thirdly, because I think that if we'd get a better education, if all of our parents would have gone to a "education school" or just have a more relative mentality, their children would have been more adapted to the society and respectfull with the other people.

In conclusion, I think that laws and rights should have been like a father's voice for all us. They should intimidate us and shows us what's "really" wrong with respected, particular and accepted arguments. If they're published for everyone and taughts us (by our parents, teachers and important people for us), they could be more respected.

With no limits

I sometimes think that the best way of living is like an animal, with no repressions and with really freedom. I know that if it's real our society'll disappear, strongest people will reign using violence and intimidations, and there'll be always wars between weak people and strong people, between sons and fathers, between brothers and between friends (if they exist in this "society"). The laws that prevent murders and stealing will disappear and all we will live with the death fear. Weak people (those that've dedicated their live at studies and analysis) will die (I think that I won't last more than 3 days) by strong people (those with more body strenght or skill), and natural selection will finally lead our specie. We'll become stronger and more adapted to our ambient and we'll live just like kings or wretchs. We'll live just like 30 years, and injuries or illness would kill us again. Our lives would be monotonous, we'll get up, kill some animal to get food, kill an "enemy", rape an attractive person, eat more food and sleep. And during the night a snake will bite us and we won't see the sun again...

In the previous post I mencioned that we should be more free and to dispel some repressions. But now I've just expressed what could happen if all we do that with no limits. In conclusion, I "like" the social situation that are we now. Just some people do what they really want to do (in some cases) and the other people see them like strange people, because they do "strange" things. I don't try to lead the people to a more free live, because I prefer to be looked as a strange man than to be killed by a snake. But I'd like that my friends do what they want like I do sometimes, I'd see they like more... human.

Without repressions

I think that something like to meet with friends or to study the lesson has becomed into a need. To keep our social status doesn't give us just a site in the world, it also defend us from him. A protection maked by a repression of our primary instincts and also a beautiful mask provides us security, but this security is weak and it can be dispelled. I think that those nobile people, that are so correct and formal, should have a lot of mentals problems (if they tries to keep this personality all the day). They are forced by theirselves to be good looked by their "friends", work members and also unknowed people. They think that if they are good looked they'll live better and will obtain more pleasure, and it could be, because society reward these people, but this mentality (dogmatic, closed, steady, correct...) will generate unwell and questions like "where do I want to arrive?".

I'm not just referring to upper class, I'm referring to a mentality that all us have, that mentality that stops us to do what we want or "need" to do. For example, the last day of this first semester I feel the need to hit something, or to scream very loud, I didn't want to go home, to be on holidays and not be able to see my friends everyday... and I couldn't do that because teachers or my classmates should have stopped me. Sometimes I feel that I need to do something eccentric, like to run fast and far away, to go out one night to anywhere, to jump up a table, to shout to a teacher etc. and I can't do it because I'd have punished. But this need tortures me and I don't want to live as a repressed. Sometimes people says that I'm so strange because I do strange things, but I think that they're the strange people because they don't do what I do, and I do what I really want to do, without repressions, with freedom.

Human Rights

0. My quiz's score is 36 wells and 5 wrongs...
1. Human rights are the rights and freedoms about physicall and mental terms that every human should have.
2. Human rights borned at 1948.
3. They were created to avoid the "superiority" of a group of humans to another group. They're attemporal, so they've became a reference of the political-etical-social order.
4. There are 30 Human Rights.
5. I wasn't heard so much about 23.3th right: "Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection."

6. and 7: Most of Human Rights are respected in my country, but there are few ones that don't. For example, the right that I've said before. There are a lot of works that doesn't give the sufficient money to the worker, and he can't support his family (it depends of the quantity of members, but now I'm talking of a family wich 3 or 4 members). We should think, also, what's the "sufficient" money to support a family, because maybe the sufficient to support a family it's just 1 piece of clothes and a bit of food for everyday. But it's common to doesn't give an exactly quantity of money for every person according to his family or needs, the bosses and company leaders will just give one exactly quantity of money to everyone, and if you don't like it, look for another work, it's the reality. And they can do it, there are no rule that prevents that, because if there's one rule that controls people's wages, one by one, there'll be like a comunism country. We can always to ask for an increase of salary to satisfy our needs, but of course they are not obligated to do that. In fact, this human right is so relative and it could be avoided easily.

In the past I think that there were the same problem, if anyone can avoid them to get an own benefit, it could be avoided. I know that's negative for the other person, and maybe there were people that was honest and equitable, but if someone have control to another person, and this one can't to be opposed to him, the controller'll seize the opportunity. This can be seen in groups of people that are constantly threatened for more "powerfull" people, if they rebel, they'll finish badly. These problem've been in the past and there are in present too, in so many countries and places there are a group of people that "are" more powerfull to another group and they abuse them. There are no many solutions, there are a lot of dreams and "it should be..."s, but it's difficult to fight and to die for a problem that will ever exist.

Podcast - Phylosophy program

My voice's like a child voice... how embarrassing!